It’s that time of year again. In addition to a Bar Mitvah and graduations, we have birthdays and anniversaries. I received a couple invitations from ECHOage last year. Here’s their homepage mission: “ECHOage is an online birthday party service where kids get the birthday gifts they want AND guests donate to charities of their choice.” (ECHOage link)
Has
your child been dreaming about getting an iPod, a bike, a puppy? With an
ECHOage birthday party, your child will be one step closer to getting it.
Half
of the money contributed by your guests is sent to your child to buy any
gifts they choose. ECHOage will send half of the money contributed by your
guests to the charity.
I
wasn’t sure how to feel. It was
troubling and offensive, but after checking the site I could understand why a
parent might use this. I’m not sure I like
this trend however.
The
last wedding we attended, the couple had their own website. Each had a profile and the registry allowed
guests to contribute to the China pattern or the honeymoon vacation, details
available at a click. Wedding gift values
vary today from $50 for a friend and $100 to $200 for close friends and
family. (TheKnot site) And graduates are in debt or going in debt, at
least the parents are. So the top gift
is cash: family giving $50 for High School and $100 for college. (eHow link
) In my town people spend about
$20 - $25 for a child’s birthday. The
ladies like to take each other out for lunch.
Yet
it seems we’re missing something. In a
material world consumed with consuming, each holiday and event translates to money
and gifts, a monotonous duty. It’s so
far gone with children, they expect gifts even when they’re not the birthday
child, you know, the goodie bags or toys the kids get for going to the other
kid’s party.
Ralph Waldo Emerson
wrote an essay on gifts which has guidelines worth sharing.
Next
to things of necessity, the rule for a gift, which one of my friends
prescribed, is, that we might convey to some person that which properly
belonged to his character, and was easily associated with him in thought. But
our tokens of compliment and love are for the most part barbarous. Rings and
other jewels are not gifts, but apologies for gifts. The only gift is a portion of thyself. Thou must bleed for me.
Therefore the poet brings his poem; the shepherd, his lamb; the farmer, corn;
the miner, a gem; the sailor, coral and shells; the painter, his picture; the
girl, a handkerchief of her own sewing. This is right and pleasing, for it
restores society in so far to its primary basis, when a man’s biography is
conveyed in his gift, and every man’s wealth is an index of his merit. But it
is a cold, lifeless business when you go to the shops to buy me something,
which does not represent your life and talent, but a goldsmith’s.
“The
only gift is a portion of thyself.” This
is the essence of the passage. It’s worth
reading the whole essay because it’s just four pages and discusses gifts always
appropriate like flowers or fruit and larger concerns about gratitude and the onerous
feeling of debt involved with gift-giving.
(Essay in full)
I
agree with Emerson, so give of yourself! It’s too bad I wasn’t friends with Vincent
Van Gogh because imagine what treasures he might give. HA! But it’s hard to be
better off than I am now since I’ve enjoyed the loveliest presents. And the invitations I’ve received have forced
me to deal with my hang ups. Here are a
couple questions I’ve answered.
What
are my favorite gifts?
For
my birthday, a friend sent gloves she knit for me wrapped in a silk scarf. Over
the holidays several friends made me tasty confections and cookies. Another wrote a long note. I had written her a couple times but was
ecstatic to receive one in return! That’s
the point after all.
As
a parent, a favorite is my children's artwork and the silly and lovely and
HONEST things they write. My birthday
collage says it best.
As this child’s mom, I may be
odd and
even a bit fruity, but inside there’s a star!
even a bit fruity, but inside there’s a star!
Back
to Emerson. So, what does it mean to
give of myself? In my case that means to write.
The
last year or so, I decided to write letters for birthdays and though Emerson
might approve, that’s not what’s important. I love writing letters and I love
getting letters as much. Here is something I can give because it is a
"portion of myself."
It
takes time, but I encourage you to write a letter. You soon realize, to say something meaningful,
you must think over what you believe.
But, you must think about that person as well: what he or she means to
you, what you want to tell them beyond a text message about where to meet and when.
You
learn that Sir Francis Bacon had it right when he said: "Reading maketh a full man, conference a
ready man, and writing an exact man."
Today's
correspondence seems limited to 140 character exchanges, Instagrams, Snapchat,
twitter and Facebook posts. The universe
of ideas, thoughtful reflection, and written communication has been distilled into sound bites, catch
phrases, headlines, hooks, and clinchers. It’s all good and the multimedia
world of words is wonderful and rich and multi-textured.
Yet,
bite sized exchanges should not replace the thoughtful and reflective and yes,
wordier, letter.
So
how’s it going with my ‘gifts’ you ask?
The last three birthday letters: a
friend said it made her cry (in a good way); another posted a photo of my
letter on Facebook, happy to receive a long missive; and the most recent said
she’d treasure it.
The
best part for me is thinking how it might make a friend feel, what they might
learn, as well as what I learned writing to them: I consider what is special about the
recipient and why I value our relationship.
I’m
not sure a birthday needs to be about getting the ultimate gift, or that we need
or should give to charity. Yet when the gift supersedes the giver, there’s a
problem, and maybe there’s something fundamentally wrong with the
relationship.
Emerson
finished his essay with this: “I like to see that we cannot be bought and sold….. But love them, and they feel you and delight
in you all the time.”
No comments:
Post a Comment